The natural history of homonymous hemianopia revisited
Saionz, E. L.; Cavanaugh, M. R.; Johnson, B. A.; Harrington, D.; Aguirre, G. K.; Huxlin, K. R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo re-evaluate the longitudinal progression of stroke-induced homonymous visual field defects using strictly automated perimetry (Zeiss Humphrey Systems), rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, and quantitative analyses. MethodsA retrospective chart review of stroke patients diagnosed with "homonymous hemianopia", who underwent monocular Humphrey visual field (HVF) perimetry using the 24-2 SITA standard pattern from 2011-2019, was conducted at a large US academic medical center. Reliable tests (<20% fixation losses, false positives, and false negatives) were identified and analyzed with generalized estimating equations to extract temporal trends in perimetric mean deviation (PMD) and deficit area. ResultsOf 532 patients with "homonymous hemianopia", sequential, reliable HVFs were only available for 36 patients in the right eye, and 30 patients in the left eye, ranging from 7 days to 58 months post-stroke. Both PMD and deficit area improved early, within the first 3 months post-stroke; however, this was followed by a subsequent decline in performance >1 year post-stroke. Changes were similar between eyes. ConclusionWe discovered that a large portion of occipital stroke patients do not receive comprehensive ophthalmologic follow-up and, even then, only a fraction of HVFs performed are reliable enough for rigorous analysis. Nonetheless, reliable HVFs in such patients confirmed early visual improvement after stroke, consistent with prior reports. However, in contrast with prior, qualitative reports, there was no stability of the deficit beyond 6 months post-stroke; instead, gradual worsening erased the initial spontaneous improvement, especially >1 year post-stroke.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 90%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 90%
- Efficacy of Simultaneous Infusion of Tirofiban with Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Anterior Choroidal or Paramedian Pontine Infarction: TITACIPPI Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced reflexive eye closure is mediated by ipRGC signals and is specific to migraine with visual aura 90%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 88%
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Cognitive Function and Large Optic Nerve Cupping, Accounting for Cup-Disc-Ratio Genetic Risk Score 92%
- Torsion-Induced Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TITON): A Physiologically Relevant Animal Model of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy 92%
- Ocular findings, surgery details and outcomes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with chronic kidney disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 91%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 91%
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 93%
- Advanced Retinal Imaging and Ocular Parameters of the Rhesus Macaque Eye 93%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.