Back

Zebrafish screen of high-confidence effector genes at insomnia GWAS loci implicates conserved regulators of sleep-wake behaviors

Zimmerman, A. J.; Doldur-Balli, F.; Keenan, B. T.; Shetty, Z. Y.; Palermo, J.; Chesi, A.; Sonti, S.; Pahl, M. C.; Brown, E. B.; Pippin, J. A.; Wells, A. D.; Mazzotti, D. R.; Veatch, O. J.; Krishnan, A.; Gehrman, P. R.; Keene, A. C.; Grant, S. F. A.; Pack, A. I.

2022-11-23 genetics
10.1101/2022.10.05.511011 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent large-scale human genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for insomnia have identified more than 200 significant loci. The functional relevance of these loci to the pathogenesis of insomnia is largely unknown. GWAS signals are typically non-coding variants, which are often arbitrarily annotated to the nearest protein-coding gene; however, due to 3D chromatin structure, variants can interact with more distal genes driving their function. The distal gene may, therefore, represent the true causal gene influencing the phenotype. By integrating our high-resolution chromatin interaction maps from neural progenitor cells with phenotypic data from a Drosophila RNAi screen, we prioritized candidate genes that we hypothesized would have deep phylogenetic conservation of sleep function. To determine the conservation of these candidate genes in the context of vertebrate sleep and their relevance to insomnia-like behaviors, we performed CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis in larval zebrafish for six highly conserved candidate genes and examined sleep-wake behaviors using automated video-tracking. CRISPR mutation of zebrafish orthologs of MEIS1 and SKIV2L produced insomnia-like behaviors, while mutation of ARFGAP2 impaired activity and development in our larval zebrafish model, demonstrating the importance of performing functional validation of GWAS-implicated effector genes to reveal genes influencing disease-relevant mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.