A semi-automatic workflow to process camera trap images in R
Böhner, H.; Kleiven, E. F.; Ims, R. A.; Soininen, E. M.
Show abstract
Camera traps have become popular for monitoring biodiversity and animal populations. Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to automatically classify large image data sets produced by camera traps and many tools that incorporate machine-learning models for automatic image classification have been developed over the last years. However, it is still challenging to combine tools for automatic classification with other tools for processing camera trap images and to adapt these tools to a specific study. Therefore, we propose a semi-automatic workflow for processing camera trap images in R. The workflow includes managing raw images, automatic image classification, a quality check of automatic image labels as well as the possibilities to retrain the model with new images and to manually review subsets of images to correct image labels. We illustrate the workflow with a case-study from the small mammal monitoring program of the Climate-ecological Observatory for Arctic Tundra. We first trained a classification model for small mammals and then transferred the model to new images, including images from newly established camera traps. We could show that retraining the original model with a small number of new images increased model performance and therefore highlight the importance of verifying automatic image labels when a model was transferred to new images. Furthermore, retraining the original model also decreased the time needed for manually reviewing images and correcting image labels substantially. Thus, the proposed workflow results in a data set with high accuracy and minimizes time needed for labeling images manually. This is especially useful for long-term monitoring where new images have to be processed continuously and methods have to be adapted over time. We provide all R scripts and the classification model for small mammals to make the workflow accessible to other ecologists.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards an automated protocol for wildlife density estimation using camera-traps 96%
- One size does not fit all: a novel approach for determining the Realised Viewshed Size for remote camera traps 95%
- Real-time alerts from AI-enabled camera traps using the Iridium satellite network: a case-study in Gabon, Central Africa 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards (Panthera uncia) after Automated Detection 96%
- Using machine learning to count Antarctic shag (Leucocarbo bransfieldensis) nests on images captured by Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 95%
- Insect Size Matters: Using Image and Dimensions Together Improves Image Classification 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the accessibility and transferability of machine learning algorithms for identification of animals in camera trap images: MLWIC2 96%
- How citizen science could improve Species Distribution Models and their independent assessment 94%
- Too few, too many, or just right? Optimizing sample sizes for population-level inferences in animal tracking projects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of object detection in camera trap image identification: assessing a method to rapidly and accurately classify human and animal detections for research and application in recreation ecology 97%
- Spatial behaviors and seasonal habitat use of the increasingly endangered thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) 92%
- Population monitoring of snow leopards using camera trapping in Naryn State Reserve, Kyrgyzstan, between 2016 and 2019 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.