Subtle Differences In Fine Polysaccharide Structures Govern Selection And Succession Of Human Gut Microbiota
Yao, T.; Deemer, D. G.; Chen, M.-H.; Reuhs, B. L.; Hamaker, B. R.; Lindemann, S. R.
Show abstract
Dietary fibers are fermented in the human gut and are known to modulate microbiome composition and metabolic function, but few studies have explored to what extent the small variations in complex fiber structures impact community assembly, microbial division of labor, and organismal metabolic responses across individuals microbiome structures. To test the hypothesis that subtle linkage variations in chemical structures of polysaccharides afford different ecological niches for distinct communities and metabolism, we employed a 7-day in vitro sequential batch fermentation with fecal inocula from individual donors and measured microbial responses using an integrated multi-omics approach. We fermented two sorghum arabinoxylans (SAXs) as model complex polysaccharides, with fecal microbiota from three donors and an artificially high diversity mix of all three. Although differences in sugar linkage profiles across SAXs were subtle, surprisingly, consortia fermenting different AXs revealed distinct species-level genomic diversity and metabolic outcomes with nearly-identical strains on each polysaccharide across inocula. Carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) genes in metagenomes revealed broad AX-related hydrolytic potentials; however, CAZyme genes enriched in different AX-fermenting consortia were specific to SAX type and displayed various catabolic domain fusions with diverse accessory motifs, suggesting they may be functionally degenerate and this degeneracy may relate to fine substrate structure. These results suggest that fine polysaccharide structure exerts deterministic selection effect for distinct fermenting consortia, which are present amongst unrelated individuals.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community 96%
- Inter-kingdom microbial interactions revealed by a comparative machine-learning guided multi-omics analysis of industrial-scale biogas plants 95%
- Copiotrophs dominate rhizosphere microbiomes and growth rate potential is a major factor explaining the rhizosphere effect 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomics and synthetic community experiments uncover the key metabolic roles of acetic acid bacteria in sourdough starter microbiomes 96%
- Long-term cellulose enrichment selects for highly cellulolytic consortia and competition for public goods 95%
- Phenotypic and genomic diversification in complex carbohydrate degrading human gut bacteria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota 96%
- Metabolic modeling of microbial communities in the chicken ceca reveals a landscape of competition and co-operation 95%
- Grapevine phyllosphere pan-metagenomics reveals pan-microbiome structure, diversity, and functional roles in downy mildew resistance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- TbasCO: Trait-based Comparative 'Omics Identifies Ecosystem-Level and Niche-Differentiating Adaptations of an Engineered Microbiome 96%
- Bacteroidia and Clostridia perform a progressive cascade of polysaccharide degradation along the hindgut of the herbivorous fish Kyphosus sydneyanus 95%
- A flexible high-throughput cultivation protocol to assess the response of individuals' gut microbiota to diet-, drug-, and host-related factors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiome-Dependent Functional Responses to Structurally Distinct Oligosaccharides Revealed by Metaproteomics 96%
- The presence and induction of regioselective dehydroxylases dictate urolithin metabolism by Enterocloster species 94%
- Shipped and shifted: modeling collection-induced bias in microbiome multi-omics using a tractable fermentation system 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.