Back

Evaluation of K-Ras4B dimer interfaces and the role of Raf effectors

Chatzigoulas, A.; Andreadelis, I.; Doerr, S.; Lamprakis, C.; Theodoropoulou, A.; Manchester, J.; Velez-Vega, C.; Duca, J. S.; Cournia, Z.

2022-10-04 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.10.04.510804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

K-Ras4B is one the most frequently mutated proteins in cancer, yet mechanistic details of its activation such as its homodimerization on the membrane remain elusive. The structural determinants of K-Ras4B homodimerization have been debated with different conformations being proposed in the literature. Here, we perform microsecond all-atom Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations on the K-Ras4B monomer in solution, the K-Ras4B monomer on the membrane, and two experimentally-based K-Ras4B dimer models of the 4-5 interface to investigate the stability of these structures bound to GTP on a model cell membrane. We then evaluate the complexes for their propensity to form stable dimers on the plasma membrane in the presence and absence of Raf[RBD-CRD] effectors. We find that Raf[RBD-CRD] effectors enhance dimer stability, suggesting that the presence of effectors is necessary for K-Ras4B dimers stabilization on the cell membrane. Moreover, we observe, for the first time, a dynamic water channel at the K-Ras4B dimer interface, and identify putative allosteric connections in the K-Ras4B dimer interface. To discover novel K-Ras4B interfaces, we perform coarse-grained MD simulations in two dissociated K-Ras4B monomers on the membrane, which reveal that the dominant dimer interface is the 4-5 interface. Finally, a druggability analysis is performed in the different K-Ras4B structures in the monomeric states. Strikingly, all known binding pockets of K-Ras4B are identified only in the structure that is membrane-bound, but not in the solution structure. Based on these results, we propose that modulating the protein-membrane interactions can be an alternative strategy for inhibiting K-Ras4B signaling.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.