Back

From Genomics to Integrative Taxonomy? The Case Study of Pocillopora Corals

OURY, N.; NOËL, C.; MONA, S.; AURELLE, D.; MAGALON, H.

2022-10-07 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.10.04.510617 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the advent of genomics, sequencing thousands of loci from hundreds of individuals now appears feasible at reasonable costs, allowing complex phylogenies to be resolved. This is particularly relevant for cnidarians, for which insufficient data due to the small number of currently available markers, coupled with difficulties in inferring gene trees and morphological incongruences, encrypts species boundaries, thereby blurring the study and conservation of these organisms. Yet, can genomics alone be used to delimit species in an integrative taxonomic context? Here, focusing on the coral genus Pocillopora, which plays key roles in Indo-Pacific reef ecosystems but has challenged taxonomists for decades, we explored and discussed the usefulness of multiple criteria (genetics, morphology, biogeography and symbiosis ecology) to delimit species of this genus. Phylogenetic inferences, clustering approaches and species delimitation methods based on genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were first used to resolve Pocillopora phylogeny and propose genomic species hypotheses from 356 colonies sampled across the Indo-Pacific (western Indian Ocean, tropical southwestern Pacific and south-east Polynesia). These species hypotheses were then compared to previous genetic evidences, as well as to evidences based on morphology, biogeography and symbiosis. Genomics allowed to delimit 21 species hypotheses where only seven are currently recognised based on current taxonomy. Moreover, 13 species were strongly supported by all approaches, either confirming their currently recognised species status, or supporting the presence of new species that need to be formally described. Some of the other genomic species hypotheses were supported by biogeographic or symbiosis evidences, but additional investigations are needed to state on their species status. Altogether, our results support (1) the obsolescence of macromorphology (i.e., overall colony and branches shape) but the relevance of micromorphology (i.e., corallite structures) to refine Pocillopora species limits, (2) the need to identify molecularly species prior to their study, as morphology can blur species identification on the field, (3) the relevance of the mtORF (coupled with other markers in some cases) as a diagnostic marker of most species, and (4) the need for a taxonomical revision in the Pocillopora genus. These results give new insights into the usefulness of multiple criteria for resolving Pocillopora species limits and will ultimately provide helpful insights for the conservation of the species from this scleractinian genus. [biogeography; cryptic species delimitation; Indo-Pacific; microsatellites; morphology; phylogenetics; single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); Symbiodiniaceae]

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.7%
4
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
24
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
27
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
30
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%