Back

Domain Adaptive Neural Inference for Neurons, Microcircuits and Networks

Sheng, K.; Zhang, S.; Beau, M.; Qu, P.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; He, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, L.; Du, K.

2022-10-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.10.03.510694 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurately inferring neural circuit connectivity from in vivo recordings is essential for understanding the computations that support behavior and cognition. However, current deep learning approaches are limited by incomplete observability and the lack of ground-truth labels in real experiments. Consequently, models are often trained on synthetic data, which leads to the well-known "model mismatch" problem when simulated dynamics diverge from true neural activity. To overcome these challenges, we present Deep Domain-Adaptive Matching (DeepDAM), a training framework that adaptively matches synthetic and in vivo data domains for neural connectivity inference. Specifically, DeepDAM fine-tunes deep neural networks on a combined dataset of synthetic simulations and unlabeled in vivo recordings, aligning the models feature representations with real neural dynamics to mitigate model mismatch. We demonstrate this approach in rodent hippocampal CA1 circuits as a proof-of-concept, achieving near-perfect connectivity inference performance (Matthews correlation coefficient [~]0.97-1.0) and substantially surpassing classical methods ([~]0.6-0.7). We further demonstrate robustness across multiple recording conditions within this hippocampal dataset. Additionally, to illustrate its broader applicability, we extend the framework to two distinct systems without altering the core methodology: a stomatogastric microcircuit in Cancer borealis (ex vivo) and single-neuron intracellular recordings in mouse, where DeepDAM significantly improves efficiency and accuracy over standard approaches. By effectively leveraging synthetic data for in vivo and ex vivo analysis, DeepDAM offers a generalizable strategy for overcoming model mismatch and represents a critical step towards data-driven reconstruction of functional neural circuits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.