Back

Targeted editing of GTR1 and GTR2 homologs directs the development of ideal low-seed and high-leaf glucosinolate oilseed mustard

Kumari, J.; Mann, A.; Kumar, R.; Pradhan, A. K.; Pental, D.; Bisht, N. C.

2022-10-05 plant biology
10.1101/2022.10.03.510517 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucosinolate content in the Brassica oilseed crops has been reduced to the globally accepted Canola quality levels, making the seed meal useful as a protein-rich animal feed. However, the overall lower glucosinolate content in such plants renders them vulnerable to pests. We report CRISPR/Cas9-based editing of glucosinolate transporter (GTR) family genes to develop ideal oilseed mustard lines with the desired low levels of seed glucosinolates while maintaining high glucosinolate levels in leaves and pod walls, without affecting the seed yield and seed quality traits. The low-seed and high-leaf glucosinolate mustard lines with improved nutritional and defense traits will raise its international trade potential both as oilseed and feed crop.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Plants
○ 94 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.4%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Horticulture Research
◐ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
The Plant Journal
○ 215 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant Communications
○ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
New Phytologist
○ 346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Plant Physiology
◐ 238 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Molecular Plant
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.3%
12
The Plant Genome
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
◐ 219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.9%
17
Plant and Cell Physiology
◐ 52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
19
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
● 57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
22
Plant Methods
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.