Back

Megakaryocyte and erythroblast DNA in plasma and platelets

Moss, J.; Ben-Ami, R.; Shai, E.; Kalish, Y.; Klochendler, A.; Cann, G.; Glaser, B.; Arad, A.; Shemer, R.; Dor, Y.

2022-10-04 genomics
10.1101/2022.10.03.510502 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments are a biological analyte with extensive utility in diagnostic medicine. Understanding the source of cfDNA and mechanisms of release is crucial for designing and interpreting cfDNA-based liquid biopsy assays. Using cell type-specific methylation markers as well as genome-wide methylation analysis, we determined that megakaryocytes, the precursors of anuclear platelets, are major contributors to cfDNA ([~]26%), while erythroblasts contribute 1-4% of cfDNA in healthy individuals. Surprisingly, we discovered that platelets contain genomic DNA fragments originating in megakaryocytes, contrary to the general understanding that platelets lack genomic DNA. Megakaryocyte-derived cfDNA is increased in pathologies involving increased platelet production (Essential Thrombocythemia, Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura) and decreased upon reduced platelet production due to chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression. Similarly, erythroblast cfDNA is reflective of erythrocyte production and is elevated in patients with Thalassemia. Megakaryocyte- and erythroblast-specific DNA methylation patterns can thus serve as novel biomarkers for pathologies involving increased or decreased thrombopoiesis and erythropoiesis, which can aid in determining the etiology of aberrant levels of erythrocytes and platelets. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=140 SRC="FIGDIR/small/510502v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@164e8borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7eb5e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d6ff73org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11cf846_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.