Evaluation of primary allied healthcare in patients recovering from COVID-19: first results after six months follow-up in a Dutch nationwide prospective cohort study
Slotegraaf, A. I.; Gerards, M. H. G.; Verburg, A. C.; de van der Schueren, M. A. E.; Kruizenga, H. M.; Graff, M. J. L.; Cup, E. H. C.; Kalf, J. G.; Lenssen, A. F.; Meijer, W. M.; Kool, R. A.; de Bie, R. A.; van der Wees, P. J.; Hoogeboom, T. J.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo report the recovery of patients receiving primary allied healthcare after a COVID-19 infection at a six-month follow-up, and to explore which patient characteristics are associated with the changes in outcomes between the baseline and six-month follow-up. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingAllied healthcare in Dutch primary care. Participants1,451 adult patients recovering from COVID-19 and receiving treatment from one or more primary care allied health professional(s) (i.e., dietitian, exercise therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist and/or speech and language therapist). ResultsFor participation (USER-P range 0 to 100), estimated mean differences of at least 2.3 points were observed after six months. For HRQoL (EQ-VAS range 0 to 100), the mean increase was 12.31 at six months. Furthermore, significant improvements were found for fatigue (FSS range 1 to 7): the mean decrease was -0.7 at six months. For physical functioning (PROMIS-PF range 13.8 to 61.3), the mean increase was 5.9 at six months. Mean differences of -0.8 for anxiety (HADS range 0 to 21), and -1.5 for depression (HADS range 0 to 21), were found after six months. Having a worse baseline score, hospital admission and male sex were associated with greater improvement between the baseline and six-month follow-up, whereas age, BMI, comorbidities and smoking status were not associated with mean changes in any outcome measure. ConclusionsPatients recovering from COVID-19 who receive primary allied healthcare make progress in recovery, but still experience many limitations in their daily activities after six months. Our findings provide reference values to healthcare providers and healthcare policy-makers regarding what to expect from the recovery of patients who received health care from one or more primary care allied health professionals. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT04735744).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 96%
- Prevalence and determinants of persistent symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2: Protocol for an observational cohort study (LongCOVID-study) 95%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and Implications for Healthcare Service Planning: A Population-based Cohort Study 95%
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychometric analysis of the modified Covid-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) in a prospective multicentre study 95%
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 94%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 94%
- Virtual rehabilitation for individuals with Long COVID: a randomized controlled trial. 93%
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 94%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 92%
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.