Back

Socioeconomic status is not associated with survival in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy

Nagtegaal, S. H.; Elias, S. G.; Snijders, T. J.; Verkooijen, H. M.; Verhoeff, J. J. C.

2022-10-04 oncology
10.1101/2022.10.03.22280630 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and purposeIn most cancer sites a low socioeconomic status (SES) is consistently associated with poorer survival. For brain metastasis, this relation is not well understood. Therefore, we studied the effect of SES on survival in Dutch brain metastasis patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery in a tertiary radiotherapy facility. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively studied 404 consecutive patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in a tertiary referral centre between 2012 and 2017. Baseline prognostic factors for survival were collected. The SES score was based on education, income and employment. Cox proportional hazard models were made, corrected for the relevant variables identified from a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Adjustments were made in two ways in order to obtain comprehensive results: correcting for confounders (total effect), and correcting for confounders and mediating factors (direct effect). ResultsUnadjusted, estimation of the linear effect of SES on survival resulted in a HR of 0.92 (95%CI 0.82 - 1.04). The total effect of SES was achieved by correcting for age, resulting in a HR of 0.95, with a 95% CI of 0.84 - 1.07. The direct effect gave a HR of 0.96 (95%CI 0.84 - 1.10). ConclusionSES was not associated with survival in patients with brain metastases undergoing radiation therapy. When correcting for clinical variables, we found no significant relationship between SES and survival, with HRs suggesting limited clinical impact. The results suggest that patients survival outcomes after contemporary cancer treatment are unrelated to their employment status, education status and annual income.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.