Back

COVID-19 vaccine antibody response is associated with side-effects, chronic health conditions, and vaccine type in a large Northern California cohort

Solomon, O.; Adams, C.; Horton, M.; Wong, M. P.; Meas, M.; Shao, X.; Fedrigo, I.; Hernandez, S.; Quach, H. L.; Quach, D. L.; Barcellos, A. L.; Coloma, J.; Busch, M. P.; Harris, E.; Barcellos, L. F.

2022-10-01 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.09.30.22280166 medRxiv
Show abstract

As vaccines have become available for COVID-19, it is important to understand factors that may impact response. The objective of this study is to describe vaccine response in a well-characterized Northern California cohort, including differences in side-effects and antibody response by vaccine type, sex, and age, as well as describe responses in subjects with pre-existing health conditions that are known risk factors for more severe COVID-19 infection. From July 2020 to March 2021, [~]5,500 adults from the East Bay Area in Northern California were followed as part of a longitudinal cohort study. Comprehensive questionnaire data and biospecimens for COVID-19 antibody testing were collected at multiple time-points. All subjects were at least 18 years of age and members of the East-Bay COVID-19 cohort who answered questionnaires related to vaccination status and side-effects at two time-points. Three vaccines, Moderna (2 doses), Pfizer-BioNTech (2 doses), and Johnson & Johnson (single dose), were examined as exposures. Additionally, pre-existing health conditions were assessed. The main outcomes of interest were anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody response (measured by S/C ratio in the Ortho VITROS assay) and self-reporting of 11 potential vaccine side effects. When comparing both doses of the Moderna vaccine to respective doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, participants receiving the Moderna vaccine had higher odds of many reported side-effects. The same was true comparing the single-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine to dose 2 of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The antibody S/C ratio also increased with each additional side-effect after the second dose. S/C ratios after vaccination were lower in participants aged 65 and older, and higher in females. At all vaccination timepoints, Moderna vaccine recipients had a higher S/C ratio. Individuals who were fully vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech had a 72.4% lower S/C ratio compared to those who were fully vaccinated with Moderna. Subjects with asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease all demonstrated more than a 20% decrease in S/C ratio. In support of previous findings, we show that antibody response to the Moderna vaccine is higher than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. We also observed that antibody response was associated with side-effects, and participants with a history of asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease had lower antibody responses. This information is important to consider as further vaccines are recommended.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.5%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
7
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
26
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%