Back

LKB1 loss rewires JNK-induced apoptotic protein dynamics through NUAKs and sensitizes KRAS-mutant NSCLC to combined KRASG12C + MCL-1 blockade

Li, C.; Syed, M. U.; Shen, Y.; Fraser, C.; Ouyang, J.; Kreuzer, J.; Clark, S. E.; Oh, A.; Walcott, M.; Morris, R.; Nabel, C.; Caenepeel, S.; Saiki, A. Y.; Rex, K.; Lipford, J. R.; Heist, R. S.; Lin, J. J.; Haas, W.; Sarosiek, K.; Hughes, P. E.; Hata, A. N.

2022-09-30 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.09.29.510137 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The efficacy of molecularly targeted anti-cancer therapies may be limited by the presence of co-occurring mutations within a tumor1-3. Conversely, these alterations may confer collateral vulnerabilities that can be leveraged for the development of novel therapeutic approaches. KRAS-mutant lung cancers are distinguished by recurrent inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor STK11/LKB14 that facilitate tumorigenesis by modulating energy balance5, 6, enhancing metastatic potential7,8 and enabling immune evasion9,10. However, whether LKB1 plays a role in modulating cellular responses to therapeutic stress is largely unknown. Here we show that LKB1 suppresses JNK-dependent stress signaling in KRAS-mutant lung cancer cells upon acute loss of oncogenic signaling. In LKB1-deficient KRAS-mutant cells, inhibition of KRAS or its downstream effector MEK leads to hyperactivation of JNK due to loss of NUAK-mediated PP1B phosphatase activity. JNK-mediated inhibitory phosphorylation of BCL-XL rewires apoptotic dependencies, rendering LKB1-deficient cells vulnerable to MCL-1 inhibition. These results uncover a previously unknown role for LKB1 in regulating stress signaling and the mitochondrial apoptotic response of cancer cells independent of its tumor suppressor activity mediated by AMPK11-13 and SIK14,15 kinases. Additionally, our study reveals a therapy-induced vulnerability in LKB1-deficient KRAS-mutant lung cancer cells that could be exploited as a genotype-informed strategy to improve the efficacy of KRAS-targeted therapies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.