Back

More than half of the variance in in-vivo 1H-MRS metabolite estimates is common to all metabolites

Prisciandaro, J. J.; Zöllner, H. J.; Murali-Manohar, S.; Oeltzschner, G.; Edden, R. A. E.

2022-09-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.29.510115 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study characterized associations among brain metabolite levels, applying bivariate and multivariate (i.e., factor analysis) statistical methods to tCr-referenced estimates of the major PRESS 1H-MRS metabolites (i.e., tNAA/tCr, tCho/tCr, mI/tCr, Glx/tCr), acquired from medial parietal lobe in a large (n=299), well-characterized international cohort of healthy volunteers (Povazan et al., 2020). Results supported the hypothesis that 1H-MRS-measured metabolite estimates are moderately intercorrelated (Mr = 0.42, SDr = 0.11, ps < 0.001), with more than half (i.e., 57%) of the total variability in metabolite estimates common to (i.e., shared by) all metabolites. Older age was significantly associated with lower levels of common metabolite variance (CMV; {beta} = -0.09, p = 0.048), despite not being associated with levels of any individual metabolite. Holding CMV levels constant, females had significantly lower levels of total choline (i.e., unique metabolite variance or UMV; {beta} = -0.19, p < 0.001), mirroring significant bivariate correlations between sex and total choline reported previously. If replicated, these results would suggest that applied 1H-MRS researchers should shift their analytical framework from examining bivariate associations between individual metabolites and specialty-dependent (e.g., clinical, research) variables of interest (e.g., using t-tests) to examining multi-variable (i.e., covariate) associations between multiple metabolites and specialty-dependent variables of interest (e.g., using multiple regression). Without this shift, clear interpretation of associations of 1H-MRS metabolites with specialty-dependent variables of interest may not be possible.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.2%
5
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
9
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
10
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%