Heritage of ancient cultures supports conservation: a continent-wide perspective from the Eurasian steppes
Deak, B.; Bede, A.; Radai, Z.; Dembicz, I.; Apostolova, I.; Batary, P.; Galle, R.; Toth, C. A.; Dozsai, J.; Moysiyenko, I. I.; Sudnik-Wojcikowska, B.; Nekhrizov, G.; Lisetskii, F. N.; Buryak, Z. A.; Kis, S.; Borza, S.; Godo, L.; Bragina, T. M.; Smelansky, I.; Molnar, A.; Ban, M.; Bathori, F.; Argay, Z.; Dani, J.; Valko, O.
Show abstract
Civilisations including ancient ones, have shaped the global ecosystems in many ways through a co-evolution of landscapes and humans. However, the cultural legacies of ancient and lost civilisations are seldom considered in conservation. Here using a continental-scale dataset containing over 1,000 data records on the localities, land cover, protection status and cultural values related to ancient steppic burial mounds (so-called kurgans), we evaluated how these iconic and widespread landmarks can contribute to grassland conservation in the Eurasian steppes, which is one of the most endangered biomes on Earth. By using Bayesian logistic generalized regressions and proportional odds logistic regressions, we aimed to reveal the potential of mounds in preserving grasslands considering landscapes with different levels of land use transformation. We also compared the conservation potential of mounds situated inside and outside protected areas and assessed whether the presence of cultural, historical or spiritual values support the maintenance of grasslands on them. We revealed that kurgans have enormous importance in preserving grasslands in transformed landscapes outside protected areas, where they can act as habitat islands, and provide an additional pillar for conservation by contributing to habitat conservation and improvement of habitat connectivity. We found that besides their steep slopes hindering ploughing, the existence of cultural, historical or religious values could almost double the chance for grassland occurrence on kurgans due to the related extensive land use and the respect of local communities. As the estimated number of steppic mounds is about 600,000 and also similar historical features exist in all continents, our results can be upscaled to a global level. Our results also suggest that an integrative socio-ecological approach in conservation might support the positive synergistic effects of conservational, landscape and cultural values.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Field margins as substitute habitat for the conservation of birds in agricultural wetlands 95%
- Conservation networks do not match the ecological requirements of amphibians 95%
- Integrating biodiversity assessments into local conservation planning: the importance of assessing suitable data sources 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Importance of agriculture for Crop Wild Relatives conservation in Switzerland 96%
- Area-based conservation planning in Japan: protected area network effectiveness to the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework 94%
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems 95%
- Spatial patterns of evolutionary diversity in Cactaceae show low ecological representation within protected areas 94%
- Rapid and continuing regional decline of butterflies in eastern Denmark 1993-2019 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of areas of very high biodiversity value to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 key commitments. 95%
- Nature representativeness in South American protected areas: Country contrasts and conservation priorities 93%
- Biomass, abundances, and abundance and geographical range size relationship of birds along a rainforest elevational gradient in Papua New Guinea 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.