Comparative Study of State-Dependent Cholesterol Binding Sites in Adenosine A2A and A1 Receptors Using Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Biologically Relevant Membranes
Tzortzini, E.; Corey, R. A.; Kolocouris, A.
Show abstract
In this study we used coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG MD) simulations to study protein-cholesterol interactions for different activation states of the A2A adenosine receptor (A2AR) and A1 adenosine receptor (A1R). Three different membranes were used, of which a plasma mimetic membrane best matched cholesterol binding sites previously detected in X-ray structures and computationally for the inactive state of A2AR. Here, cholesterol binds stably between TM5 and TM6 in the intracellular leaf and between the extracellular part of TM6 and TM7. The stability of the identified binding sites to A1R with CG MD simulations were further investigated using potential of mean force calculations combined with umbrella sampling. Cholesterol binding to certain cavities in active or inactive state can stabilize a conformation of active or inactive state respectively and is important to identify these cavities. For the active state the cholesterol binding sites have much longer residence times compared to the inactive state for both A2AR and A1R. We observed for the active A1R two cholesterol binding sites in the extracellular membrane leaf in a cavity between TM2/TM3 and along TM3 in the intracellular leaf. We found a partially overlapped binding area between TM6 and TM7 in the extracellular membrane leaf for active state and inactive A1R state which can be antagonized by cholesterol molecules although the site has a much longer residence time for active A1R. For the active A2AR we predicted a high residence time cholesterol position between TM1 and TM7 in the middle region of TMD which is different from the binding sites calculated in active or inactive A1R and for the inactive A2AR. For the inactive A2AR cholesterol binds to the same extracellular area between TM6 and TM7 as in the inactive A1R. The differences in stable, long residence time cholesterol binding sites between active and inactive states of A1R and for A2AR can be important for functional activity and orthosteric agonist or antagonist affinity and can be used for the design of allosteric modulators which can bind through lipid pathways.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Design of Myristoylated Cell Penetrating Peptides Targeting Oncogenic K-Ras.G12D at the Effector Binding Membrane Interface 97%
- Selective Activation of GPCRs: Molecular Dynamics Shows Siponimod Binds but Fails to Activate S1PR2 Unlike S1PR1 96%
- Allosteric effect of nanobody binding on ligand-specific active states of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Allosteric Cholesterol Site in Glycine Receptors Characterized Through Molecular Simulations 96%
- In bacterial membranes lipid II changes the stability of pores formed by the antimicrobial peptide nisin 96%
- Coevolution-driven method for efficiently simulating conformational changes in proteins reveals molecular details of ligand effects in the beta2AR receptor 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian nonparametric analysis of residence times for protein-lipid interactions in Molecular Dynamics simulations 96%
- G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Dissociation Rates and Mechanisms from {tau}RAMD Simulations 96%
- Insights into Membrane Protein-Lipid Interactions from Free Energy Calculations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Atomistic Insights into gp82 Binding: A Microsecond, Million-Atom Exploration of Trypanosoma cruzi Host-Cell Invasion 95%
- A major disease-related point mutation in spastin alters dramatically the dynamics and allostery of the motor 94%
- A Method For Estimating The Cholesterol Affinity Of Integral Membrane Proteins From Experimental Data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.