Characterising modulatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation using the perceptual template model.
Gotsis, S.; van Boxtel, J. J. A.; Teufel, C.; Edwards, M.; Christensen, B. K.
Show abstract
Neural noise is an inherent property of all nervous systems. However, the mechanisms by which such random and fluctuating neural activity influences perception are still unclear. To elucidate the relationship between neural noise and perceptual performance we require techniques that can safely manipulate neural noise in humans. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a form of electrical brain stimulation, has been proposed to increase neural noise according to principles of stochastic resonance (SR); where small to moderate intensities of tRNS improve performance, while higher intensities are detrimental. To date, high intensity (i.e., >2mA) tRNS effects on neural noise levels have not been directly quantified, nor have the detrimental effects proposed by SR been demonstrated in early visual processing. For this purpose, we applied a maximum current intensity of 3mA high-frequency tRNS to the visual cortex (V1) during an orientation discrimination task across increasing external visual noise levels, and fit the perceptual template model to contrast thresholds to quantify intrinsic mechanisms related to noise underlying changes in perceptual performance. We found that tRNS generally worsened perceptual performance by increasing observers internal noise and reducing the ability to filter external noise compared to sham. While most observers experienced detrimental effects, others demonstrated improved perceptual performance (i.e., reduced internal noise and better noise filtering). Preliminary evidence suggests that individual baseline internal noise levels may drive the observed beneficial or detrimental observer responses to tRNS. These findings have important implications for the application of tRNS to investigate the impact of internal noise and noise filtering processes on perception.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 95%
- The speed of sight: individual variation in critical flicker fusion thresholds 94%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feeling Senseless Sensations: A Crossmodal study of mismatching tactile and virtual visual experience 95%
- Virtual reality validation of naturalistic modulation strategies to counteract fading in retinal stimulation 95%
- Statistical Characterization of Cortical-Thalamic Dynamics Evoked by Cortical Stimulation in Mice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The visual cortex produces gamma band echo in response to broadband visual flicker 93%
- Personalized Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Effective Neurointervention Across Participants 93%
- Time-resolved dynamic computational modeling of human EEG recordings reveals gradients of generative mechanisms for the MMN response 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task 95%
- Brain Functional Connectivity Correlates of Anomalous Interaction Between Sensorily Isolated Monozygotic Twins 95%
- Transient amplitude modulation of alpha-band oscillations by short-time intermittent closed-loop tACS 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.