Back

Commensal-specific CD4 T cells promote inflammation in the central nervous system via molecular mimicry

White, Z.; Cabrera, I.; Ochoa-Raya, A.; Kapustka, I.; Koster, K. P.; Matsuo, T.; Jayawardena, D.; Kageyama, T.; Dudeja, P. K.; Lutz, S. E.; Yoshii, A.; Sano, T.

2022-09-28 immunology
10.1101/2022.09.27.509786 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Commensal bacteria are critical regulators of both tissue homeostasis and the development and exacerbation of autoimmunity. However, it remains unclear how the intestinal microbiota contributes to inflammation in tissues such as the central nervous system (CNS) where these microbes are typically absent and whether T cell receptor (TCR) specificity for commensal-derived antigens is important to the development of tissue inflammation-related outcomes. Here, we found that ileum- and cecum-colonizing segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB)-specific T cells (clone TCR7B8) can infiltrate the CNS wherein they can be reactivated and produce high levels of inflammatory cytokines including IFN{gamma}, IL-17A, TNF, and GM-CSF in the absence of regulatory T cells. In contrast, other SFB-specific T cells (clone TCR1A2) recognizing an epitope in which 8/9 amino acids overlap with those recognized by TCR7B8 failed to induce such neuroinflammation. Despite their similar SFB-derived peptide antigen targets, TCR7B8 was found to recognize peptides derived from host proteins including receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB2, trophinin 1, and anaphase-promoting complex subunit 2 in vitro, whereas TCR1A2 did not, indicating that TCR7B8 induces CNS inflammation via molecular mimicry. Immune checkpoint blockade accelerated TCR7B8-mediated CNS inflammation, suggesting a potential cause of immune-related adverse events induced in cancer patients undergoing such treatment. Together, our findings reveal a potential mechanism whereby gut commensal-specific T cells are dysregulated and contribute to extraintestinal inflammation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.