Rising novelty and homogenization of breeding bird communities in the U.S.
Latimer, C. E.; Graves, R.; Pidgeon, A. M.; Gorzo, J. M.; Henschell, M. M.; Schilke, P. R.; Hobi, M. L.; Olah, A.; Kennedy, C. M.; Zuckerberg, B.; Radeloff, V. C.
Show abstract
AimHuman modification has profound effects on the diversity of ecological communities. Yet, surprisingly little is known about how abiotic novelty due to human modification relates to biological novelty as measured by shifts in species composition from historical baselines. Using space-for-time substitution, we ask a) whether high human modification results in biotic homogenization or heterogenization across different spatial scales; b) if high modification results in the formation of novel, "no-analog" communities; and c) whether changes in bird community composition varies in response to proxies of historical land-use and duration-of-exposure to anthropogenic disturbances. LocationConterminous United States. Time Period2012 - 2016. Major taxa studiedPasseriformes. MethodsWe analyzed continent-wide avian biodiversity data from an online checklist program, eBird, to examine how shifts in breeding bird species composition have been impacted by human modification at regional and continental scales and tested four hypotheses related to how abiotic novelty resulting from human modification generates biological novelty. ResultsAt regional scales, bird communities in highly human-modified areas exhibited similar levels of {beta}-diversity as those in the least modified areas. However, at the continental scale, spatial turnover in community composition was lower in human-modified areas, suggesting that anthropogenic disturbance has a strong homogenizing effect on bird communities at that scale. Lastly, human modification contributed more to community composition in regions where natural disturbance was infrequent and Euro-American settlement occurred later, consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to historical disturbances can shape how contemporary bird communities respond to human modification. Main conclusionsThe observed patterns of increased biotic novelty and homogenization in regions with less frequent disturbances and a longer history of human modification suggests that future extensive human modification could result in further homogenization of bird communities, particularly in the western U.S. We argue that current human-modified environments hold great potential for biodiversity conservation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness 96%
- Maintenance of community function through compensation breaks down over time in a desert rodent community 95%
- Diversity-stability relationships become decoupled across spatial scales: a synthesis of organism and ecosystem types 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trait-similarity and trait-hierarchy jointly determine co-occurrences of resident and invasive ant species 93%
- Predicting predator-prey interactions in terrestrial endotherms using random forest 92%
- Elevated human impact on islands increases the introduction and extinction status of native insular reptiles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- No consistent effects of humans on animal genetic diversity worldwide 94%
- Legacy of the lost and pressure of the present: Malagasy plant seeds retain megafauna dispersal signatures but downsize under human footprint 93%
- Jack-of-all-trades paradigm meets long-term data: generalist herbivores are more widespread and locally less abundant 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fractal triads efficiently sample ecological diversity and processes across spatial scales 94%
- The roles of isolation and interspecific interaction in generating the functional diversity of an insular mammal radiation 93%
- Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.