Incorporating natural language into vision models improves prediction and understanding of higher visual cortex
Wang, A. Y.; Kay, K.; Naselaris, T.; Tarr, M. J.; Wehbe, L.
Show abstract
Advances in neural networks have been catalyzed by joint training on images and natural language, increased dataset sizes, and data diversity. We explored whether the same factors support similar improvements in predicting visual responses in the human brain. We used models pre-trained with Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) - which learns image embeddings that best match text embeddings of image captions from diverse, large-scale datasets - to study visual representations. We built voxelwise encoding models based on CLIP image features to predict brain responses to real-world images. ResNet50 with CLIP explained up to R2 = 79% of variance in individual voxel responses in held-out test data, a significant increase from models trained only with image/label pairs (ImageNet trained ResNet) or text (BERT). Comparisons across different model backbones ruled out network architecture as a factor in performance improvements. Comparisons across models that controlled for dataset size and data diversity demonstrated that language feedback along with data diversity in larger datasets are important factors in explaining neural responses in high-level visual brain regions. Visualizations of model embeddings and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that our models capture both global and fine-grained semantic dimensions represented within human visual cortex.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning framework for inference of single-trial neural population dynamics from calcium imaging with sub-frame temporal resolution 95%
- Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients 95%
- Two common and distinct forms of variation in human functional brain networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.