Back

Effectiveness of Digital Delivery of Diabetes-Related Lifestyle Interventions in Decreasing A1c: A Systematic Review

Rapoport, H.

2022-09-29 endocrinology
10.1101/2022.09.27.22280384 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDigital delivery of lifestyle interventions offers a potentially effective, affordable, and convenient option for patients to prevent and monitor type 2 diabetes (T2D) (Khan et al., 2019). Hemoglobin A1c (A1c) is a measure used to monitor T2D progression. Standard of care- based approaches to encourage lifestyle modification have been shown to decrease A1c, yet high healthcare costs and travel-related barriers limit the accessibility of these strategies. Rising T2D rates globally underscore the immediate need to identify the most comparably effective options that decrease A1c and address disease prevention and management. ObjectivesThis systematic review examines the effectiveness of digital delivery of lifestyle interventions in decreasing A1c among adults globally both overall and compared to standard ofcare and monitoring only based approaches. MethodsBased on application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology, 10 studies conducted in eight countries met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated for bias, quality, and strength of evidence. Conclusions were drawn from evaluating quantitative results. ResultsA systematic review of the literature demonstrated sufficient evidence of an association between digital delivery of lifestyle interventions and decreased A1c trends. Research did not show significant differences in A1c changes among the intervention groups when compared to the standard of care and monitoring only based control groups. ConclusionsThese results indicate that while the digital delivery of lifestyle interventions is effective in lowering A1c levels in T2D patients, these interventions do not outperform standard of care and monitoring only based approaches to prevent and manage T2D.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
23
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%