Back

Effectiveness of Digital Delivery of Diabetes-Related Lifestyle Interventions in Decreasing A1c: A Systematic Review

Rapoport, H.

2022-09-29 endocrinology
10.1101/2022.09.27.22280384
Show abstract

BackgroundDigital delivery of lifestyle interventions offers a potentially effective, affordable, and convenient option for patients to prevent and monitor type 2 diabetes (T2D) (Khan et al., 2019). Hemoglobin A1c (A1c) is a measure used to monitor T2D progression. Standard of care- based approaches to encourage lifestyle modification have been shown to decrease A1c, yet high healthcare costs and travel-related barriers limit the accessibility of these strategies. Rising T2D rates globally underscore the immediate need to identify the most comparably effective options that decrease A1c and address disease prevention and management. ObjectivesThis systematic review examines the effectiveness of digital delivery of lifestyle interventions in decreasing A1c among adults globally both overall and compared to standard ofcare and monitoring only based approaches. MethodsBased on application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology, 10 studies conducted in eight countries met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated for bias, quality, and strength of evidence. Conclusions were drawn from evaluating quantitative results. ResultsA systematic review of the literature demonstrated sufficient evidence of an association between digital delivery of lifestyle interventions and decreased A1c trends. Research did not show significant differences in A1c changes among the intervention groups when compared to the standard of care and monitoring only based control groups. ConclusionsThese results indicate that while the digital delivery of lifestyle interventions is effective in lowering A1c levels in T2D patients, these interventions do not outperform standard of care and monitoring only based approaches to prevent and manage T2D.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 32%
15.1%
3
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 13%
8.6%
4
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.9%
3.2%
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
11
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.8%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 73%
1.5%
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
17
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 15%
1.4%
18
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 16%
1.4%
20
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 15%
0.9%
22
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
23
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 7%
0.5%