Back

The population-level impact of Enterococcus faecalis genetics on intestinal colonisation and extraintestinal infection

Chaguza, C.; Pöntinen, A. K.; Top, J.; Arredondo-Alonso, S.; Freitas, A. R.; Novais, C.; Torres, C.; Bentley, S. D.; Peixe, L.; Coque, T. M.; Willems, R. J. L.; Corander, J.

2022-09-26 microbiology
10.1101/2022.09.26.509451 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enterococcus faecalis is a commensal pathogenic bacterium commonly found in the human gastrointestinal tract and a cause of opportunistic infections typically associated with multidrug resistance. The E. faecalis genetic changes associated with pathogenicity and extraintestinal infection, particularly through gut-to-bloodstream translocation, are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the E. faecalis genetic signatures associated with intestinal colonisation and extraintestinal infection and infection of hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals using heritability estimation and a genome-wide association study (GWAS). We analysed 750 whole-genome sequences of faecal and bloodstream E. faecalis isolates from hospitalised patients and non-hospitalised individuals, respectively, predominantly in Europe. We found that E. faecalis infection of individuals depending on their hospitalisation status and extraintestinal infection are heritable traits and that [~]24% and [~]34% of their variation is explained by the considered genetic effects, respectively. Further, a GWAS using linear mixed models did not pinpoint any clear enrichment of individual genetic changes in isolates from different isolation sites and individuals with varying hospitalisation statuses, suggesting that these traits are highly polygenic. Altogether, our findings indicate that E. faecalis infection and extraintestinal infection are influenced by variation in genetic, host, and environmental factors, and ultimately the opportunistic pathogenic lifestyle of this versatile host generalist bacterium.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.