Brain mechanism of foraging: reward-dependentsynaptic plasticity or neural integration of values?
Pereira-Obilinovic, U.; Hou, H.; Svoboda, K.; Wang, X.-J.
Show abstract
During foraging behavior, action values are persistently encoded in neural activity and updated depending on the history of choice outcomes. What is the neural mechanism for action value maintenance and updating? Here we explore two contrasting network models: synaptic learning of action value versus neural integration. We show that both models can reproduce extant experimental data, but they yield distinct predictions about the underlying biological neural circuits. In particular, the neural integrator model but not the synaptic model requires that reward signals are mediated by neural pools selective for action alternatives and their projections are aligned with linear attractor axes in the valuation system. We demonstrate experimentally observable neural dynamical signatures and feasible perturbations to differentiate the two contrasting scenarios, suggesting that the synaptic model is a more robust candidate mechanism. Overall, this work provides a modeling framework to guide future experimental research on probabilistic foraging.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exact linear theory of perturbation response in a space- and feature-dependent cortical circuit model 96%
- Synaptic weight dynamics underlying memory consolidation: implications for learning rules, circuit organization, and circuit function 96%
- Impact of crowding on the diversity of expanding populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous Synaptic Homeostasis: A Novel Mechanism Boosting Information Propagation in the Cortex 96%
- Maximally efficient prediction in the early fly visual system may support evasive flight maneuvers 96%
- Opponent processes in visual memories: a model of attraction and repulsion in navigating insects' mushroom bodies. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.