Back

The additive effect of genetic modifiers on ALS prognosis: a population-based study

Chio, A.; Moglia, C.; Canosa, A.; Manera, U.; Grassano, M.; Vasta, R.; Palumbo, F.; Gallone, S.; Brunetti, M.; Barberis, M.; De Marchi, F.; Dalgard, C.; Chia, R.; Mora, G.; Iazzolino, B.; Peotta, L.; Traynor, B. J.; Corrado, L.; D'Alfonso, S.; Mazzini, L.; Calvo, A.

2022-09-27 neurology
10.1101/2022.09.25.22280338 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo determine if the co-presence of genetic polymorphisms related to ALS has additive effects on the course of the disease in a population-based cohort of Italian patients. MethodsThe study population includes 1245 ALS patients identified through the Piemonte Register for ALS, diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 and not carrying SOD1, TARDBP and FUS mutations. Controls were 766 age, sex, and geographically matched Italian subjects. We considered UNC13A (rs12608932), CAMTA1 (rs2412208), SLC112A (rs407135) and ZNF512B (ZNF512B) polymorphisms, as well as ATXN2 polyQ intermediate repeats and C9ORF72 GGGGCC intronic expansion. ResultsThe variants in C9orf72 (p=0.016), ATXN2 (p<0.001) and UNC13A (p<0.001) were significantly related to survival in univariate analysis, while the other considered variants did not influence ALS outcome. However, in the Cox multivariable analysis, also CAMTA1 emerged to be independently related to survival. When assessing the interaction by pairs of genes, we found that the presence of both detrimental alleles/expansion was correlated with significantly shorter survival compared to subjects non-carrying both detrimental alleles/expansions. Each association of pairs of detrimental alleles was characterized by specific clinical phenotypes. Conclusionswe demonstrated that gene polymorphisms acting as genetic modifiers of ALS survival can act on their own or in unison. Overall, 54% of patients carried at least one detrimental common polymorphism or repeat expansion, highlighting the clinical impact of our findings. In addition, the identification of the synergic effects of modifier genes represents an essential clue for explaining ALS clinical heterogeneity and should be considered in designing and interpreting clinical trials. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSBesides the disease-causing genes, several other genes have been reported to act as modifiers of ALS phenotype, especially patients survival. However, the interactions of these genes at clinical level have never been explored. What this study addsWe demonstrated that gene polymorphisms and expansions acting as genetic modifiers of ALS survival can act on their own or in unison. Overall, 54% of patients carried at least one detrimental allele at common polymorphism or repeat expansion, highlighting the clinical impact of our findings. How this study might affect research, practice, or policThe identification of the synergic effects of modifier genes represents an essential clue for explaining ALS clinical heterogeneity, will have deep effects on clinical trial design and interpretation and support the inclusion of these polymorphisms in ALS genetic panels.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
17
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%