Psychological safety, hierarchy, and other issues in operating room debriefing: reflexive thematic analysis of interviews from the frontline
McElroy, C.; Skegg, E.; Mudgway, M.; Murray, N.; Holmes, L.; Weller, J.; Hamill, J. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundDebriefing is a team discussion in a constructive, supportive environment. Barriers exist to consistent, effective, operative team debriefing. AimTo identify barriers to debriefing and their potential solutions as articulated by operating room personnel. DesignQualitative study. MethodsBetween December 2021 and February 2022 we interviewed operating room workers in a tertiary childrens hospital. We used purposive sampling to interview a variety of professions and specialties who work in the operating room environment. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. The qualitative approach was reflexive thematic analysis with the theoretical framework was critical realism. ResultsInterviews were analysed from 40 operating room staff: 14 nurses,7 anaesthetic technicians, 7 anaesthetists, and 12 surgeons; 25 (62%) were female. The five key themes were: 1) "commitment to learning" - healthcare workers are committed to teamwork, quality improvement, and teamwork; 2) "its a safe space" - psychological safety is a pre-requisite for, and is enhanced by, debriefing; "natural born leader" - the value of leadership and also the limitations caused by psychological constructs about what and who is a leader; 4) "space-time" - finding time to debrief after routine operations and after critical events; and 5) "doing the basics well" - debriefing needs structure without being over-complicated. ConclusionPsychological safety is both a prerequisite for and a product of debriefing. Leadership, if viewed as a collective responsibility, could help break down power structures. Given the results of this study and evidence in the literature, it is likely that routine debriefing, if well done, will improve psychological safety, facilitate team learning, reduce errors, and improve patient safety. Relevance to Clinical PracticeDebriefing is challenging to perform, requires leadership and training, but is worth the effort. Nurses can take a leading role in promoting routine debriefing in healthcare. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?O_LIDebriefing, if done well, promotes teamwork, psychological safety in the workplace, quality and safety, and organisational learning. C_LIO_LISetting up an effective debriefing programme is challenging but worth the effort. C_LIO_LIDebriefing requires collaboration and nurses are well placed to be leaders in debriefing policy design and to lead multidisciplinary debriefs. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 96%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 95%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 93%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 92%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 93%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.