ARCliDS: A Clinical Decision Support System for AI-assisted Decision-Making in Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy
Niraula, D.; Sun, W.; Jin, J.; Dinov, I.; Cuneo, K.; Jamaluddin, J.; Matuszak, M. M.; Luo, Y.; Lawrence, T. S.; Jolly, S.; Ten Haken, R. K.; El Naqa, I.
Show abstract
BackgroundInvolvement of many variables, uncertainty in treatment response, and inter-patient heterogeneity challenge objective decision-making in dynamic treatment regime (DTR) in oncology. Advanced machine learning analytics in conjunction with information-rich dense multi-omics data have the ability to overcome such challenges. We have developed a comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI)-based optimal decision-making framework for assisting oncologists in DTR. In this work, we demonstrate the proposed framework to Knowledge Based Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy (KBR-ART) applications by developing an interactive software tool entitled Adaptive Radiotherapy Clinical Decision Support (ARCliDS). MethodsARCliDS is composed of two main components: Artificial RT Environment (ARTE) and Optimal Decision Maker (ODM). ARTE is designed as a Markov decision process and modeled via supervised learning. Given a patients pre- and during-treatment information, ARTE can estimate treatment outcomes for a selected daily dosage value (radiation fraction size). ODM is formulated using reinforcement learning and is trained on ARTE. ODM can recommend optimal daily dosage adjustments to maximize the tumor local control probability and minimize the side effects. Graph Neural Network (GNN) is applied to exploit the inter-feature relationships for improved modeling performance and a novel double GNN architecture is designed to avoid unphysical treatment response. Datasets of size 117 and 292 were available from two clinical trials on adaptive RT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and adaptive stereotactic body RT (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, respectively. For training and validation, dense data with 297 features were available for 67 NSCLC patients and 110 features for 71 HCC patients. To increase the sample size for ODM training, we applied Generative Adversarial Network to generate 10,000 synthetic patients. The ODM was trained on the synthetic patients and validated on the original dataset. ResultsDouble GNN architecture was able to correct the unphysical dose-response trend and improve ARCliDS recommendation. The average root mean squared difference (RMSD) between ARCliDS recommendation and reported clinical decisions using double GNNs were 0.61 {+/-} 0.03 Gy/frac (mean{+/-}sem) for adaptive RT in NSCLC patients and 2.96 {+/-} 0.42 Gy/frac for adaptive SBRT HCC compared to the single GNNs RMSDs of 0.97 {+/-} 0.12 Gy/frac and 4.75 {+/-} 0.16 Gy/frac, respectively. Overall, For NSCLC and HCC, ARCliDS with double GNNs was able to reproduce 36% and 50% of the good clinical decisions (local control and no side effects) and improve 74% and 30% of the bad clinical decisions, respectively. ConclusionARCliDS is the first web-based software dedicated to assist KBR-ART with multi-omics data. ARCliDS can learn from the reported clinical decisions and facilitate AI-assisted clinical decision-making for improving the outcomes in DTR.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 96%
- Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation 94%
- Bayesian Learning to Reduce Cardiac Risk for Locally Advanced NSCLC Patients Based on Personalized Radiotherapy Prescription 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning NTCP model for late dysphagia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients based on 3D dose, CT and segmentations 94%
- Artificial Intelligence Uncertainty Quantification in Radiotherapy Applications - A Scoping Review 94%
- First demonstration of the FLASH effect with ultrahigh dose-rate high-energy X-rays 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 94%
- Cell lines of the same anatomic site and histologic type show large variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity and relative biological effectiveness to protons and carbon ions 93%
- Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 96%
- Multiwell-based G0-PCC assay for radiation biodosimetry 93%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.