Back

Prediction of Biopharmaceutical Characteristics of PROTACs using the ANDROMEDA by Prosilico Software

Fagerholm, U.; Hellberg, S.; Alvarsson, J.; Spjuth, O.

2022-09-23 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.09.22.509053 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPROTACs are comparably large and flexible compounds with limited solubility (S) and permeability (Pe). It is crucial to better understand, predict and optimize their human clinical pharmacokinetics (PK). MethodsThe main objective was to use the ANDROMEDA by Prosilico software to predict the human clinical in vivo dissolution potential (fdiss) and fraction absorbed (fa) of 23 PROTACs at a dose level of 50 mg and to explore whether there is any relationship between in vitro S and in silico predicted in vivo fdiss. ResultsIn silico predictions showed that the PROTACs are effluxed by intestinal transporters and have limited fdiss (34 to 98 %), permeability and fa (13 to 58 %) in man. For some PROTACs this may be a major obstacle and jeopardize the clinical development programs, especially in cases of required high oral dose. A modest relationship between in vitro S and predicted in vivo fdiss was demonstrated (R2=0.26). Predicted human fa (27 %) and oral bioavailability (20 %) of ARV-110 (a PROTAC with some available in vivo PK data in rodents and man) were consistent with data obtained in rodents (estimated fa approximately 30-40 %; measured oral bioavailability 27-38 %). Laboratories were unable to quantify S for 7 (30 %) of the PROTACs. In contrast, ANDROMEDA could predict parameters for all. ConclusionANDROMEDA predicted fdiss and fa for all the chosen PROTACs and showed limited fdiss, Pe and fa and dose-dependent fdiss and fa. One available example shows promise for the applicability of ANDROMEDA for predicting biopharmaceutics of PROTACs in vivo in man. Weak to modest correlations between S and fdiss and a considerable portion of compounds with non-quantifiable S limit the use of S-data to predict the uptake of PROTACs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
10
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
14
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
16
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%