Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Attention, Memory, and Sensorimotor Performance
O'Connor, E.; Rednam, N.; OBrien, R.; OBrien, S.; Rock, P.; Levine, A.; Zeffiro, T. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecovery after SARS-CoV-2 infection is extremely variable, with some individuals recovering quickly, and others experiencing persistent long-term symptoms or developing new symptoms after the acute phase of infection, including fatigue, poor concentration, impaired attention, or memory deficits. Many existing studies reporting cognitive deficits associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited by the exclusive use of self-reported measures or a lack of adequate comparison groups. MethodsForty-five participants, ages 18-70, (11 Long-COVID, 14 COVID, and 20 No-COVID) underwent behavioral testing with the NIH Toolbox Neuro-Quality of Life survey and selected psychometric tests, including a flanker interference task and the d2 Test of Attention. ResultsWe found greater self-reported anxiety, apathy, fatigue, emotional dyscontrol, sleep disturbance and cognitive dysfunction in COVID compared No-COVID groups. After categorizing COVID patients according to self-reported concentration problems, we observed declining performance patterns in multiple attention measures across No-COVID controls, COVID and Long-COVID groups. COVID participants, compared to No-COVID controls, exhibited worse performance on NIH Toolbox assessments, including the Eriksen Flanker, Nine-Hole Pegboard and Auditory Verbal Learning tests. ConclusionThis study provides convergent evidence that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with impairments in sustained attention, processing speed, self-reported fatigue and concentration. The finding that some patients have cognitive and visuomotor dysfunction in the absence of self-reported problems suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection can have unexpected and persistent subclinical consequences.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported health, neuropsychological tests and biomarkers in fully recovered COVID-19 patients vs patients with post-COVID cognitive symptoms: a pilot study 96%
- The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz 95%
- Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 94%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 93%
- Correlates of patient-reported cognitive performance with regard to disability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic post-COVID neuropsychiatric symptoms persisting beyond one year from infection: a case-control study and network analysis 93%
- ROC Analysis of Biomarker Combinations in Fragile X Syndrome-Specific Clinical Trials: Evaluating Treatment Efficacy via Exploratory Biomarkers 91%
- Metabolic Disturbances, Hemoglobin A1c, and Social Cognition Impairment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVCOG 2: Cognitive and Memory Deficits in Long COVID: A Second Publication from the COVID and Cognition Study 96%
- COVCOG 1: Factors predicting Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID. A First Publication from the COVID and Cognition Study 94%
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) impact quality of life at 6, 12 and 18 months post-infection 92%
- High proportion of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals 1-6 months after illness and association with disease severity in an outpatient telemedicine population 91%
- Demographic disparities in clinical outcomes of COVID-19: data from a statewide cohort in South Carolina 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.