Data-driven identification of unusual prescribing behaviour: an analysis and interactive data tool using six months of primary care data from 6500 practices in England
Hopcroft, L. E. M.; Massey, J.; Curtis, H.; MacKenna, B.; Croker, R.; Macdonald, O.; Evans, D.; Inglesby, P.; Bacon, S.; O'Dwyer, T.; Goldacre, B.; Walker, A. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundApproaches to addressing unwarranted variation in healthcare service delivery have traditionally relied on the prospective identification of activities and outcomes, based on a hypothesis, with subsequent reporting against defined measures. Practice-level prescribing data in England are made publicly available by the NHS Business Services Authority for all general practices. There is an opportunity to adopt a more data-driven approach to capture variability and identify outliers by applying hypothesis free data driven algorithms to national datasets. ObjectivesTo develop and apply a hypothesis free algorithm to identify unusual prescribing behaviour in primary care data at multiple administrative levels in the NHS in England, and to visualise these results using organisation-specific interactive dashboards. MethodsHere we report a new data-driven approach to quantify how unusual prescribing rates of a particular chemical within an organisation are as compared to peer organisations, over a period of six months (June-December 2021). This is followed by ranking to identify which chemicals are the most notable outliers in each organisation. These outlying chemicals are calculated for all practices, primary care networks, clinical commissioning groups and sustainability and transformation partnerships in England. Results are presented via organisation-specific interactive dashboards, the iterative development of which has been informed by user feedback. ResultsUser feedback and internal review of case studies demonstrate that our methodology identifies chemicals that are in line with local policies and internal reporting. ConclusionsData-driven approaches overcome existing biases with regards to the planning and execution of audits, interventions and policy-making within NHS organisations, potentially revealing new targets for improved healthcare service delivery. We provide our dashboards as a candidate list for the consideration of expert users to prioritise for further interpretation and qualitative research in terms of potential targets for improved performance.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 91%
- Comparing human vs. machine-assisted analysis to develop a new approach for Big Qualitative Data Analysis 91%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of CancelRx on Discontinuation of Controlled Substance Prescriptions 92%
- Electronic prescribing systems as tools to improve patient care: a learning health systems approach to increase guideline concordant prescribing for venous thromboembolism prevention 92%
- A Multi-Granular Stacked Regression for Forecasting Long-Term Demand in Emergency Departments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determining prescriptions in electronic health care (EHR) data: methods for development of standardised, reproducible drug codelists 95%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 92%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 93%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 92%
- Active vaccine safety surveillance via a scalable, integrated system in Australian pharmacies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.