Back

How do the activities of daily living decline in people living with rarer dementias? A systematic review.

Taylor, B.; Mohamud, S.; Brotherhood, E.; Harding, E.; Waddington, C.; Camic, P.; Alexander, D.; Crutch, S.; Stott, J.; Hardy, C.; Oxtoby, N.

2022-09-23 neurology
10.1101/2022.09.22.22280192 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo study how activities of daily living (ADLs) decline over the progressive course of rarer dementias (prevalence below 10%), in a systematic review of the literature. Methods Relevant studies were identified by searching Medline, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO and Cinahl. The databases were searched for terms relating to (rarer dementias) AND (activities of daily living) AND (longitudinal OR cross-sectional studies), using a pre-established protocol registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration: CRD42021283302). ResultsA total of 579 articles were screened for relevant content, of which 20 full-text publications were included in the analysis. Nineteen studies were about rarer dementias on the frontotemporal dementia/primary progressive aphasia spectrum, and one was about posterior cortical atrophy. Long term description of decline was limited to just seven studies following patients for longer than five years. The rate of decline, sequence of symptom onset, and symptom duration were also highlighted. ConclusionDescriptions of ADL progression were inadequately long term, covering an average of 3.5 years from symptom onset, and lacked phenotypic specificity. The literature disproportionately studied dementias on the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. To facilitate better care, more longitudinal data, quantitative analyses, and development of rarer dementia-specific ADL scales is needed. Given the low prevalence of rarer dementias, big data analyses may never be applicable and so personalised medicine approaches should be pursued, including innovative possibilities in digital biomarkers such as from wearable technology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
7
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
11
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%