Assessment tools and incidence of hospital-associated disability: a rapid systematic review
Katia, G.; Roger, H.; David, B.; Jan, T.; Karl Martin, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring hospitalization older people have a high risk of developing functional impairments unrelated to the reasons for their admission. This is termed hospital-associated disability. This systematic review aimed to assess the incidence of hospital-associated disability among older patients admitted to acute care, to identify the tools used to assess activities of daily living in these patients, and evaluate which functional task is most sensitive for detecting changes in disability among older hospitalized patients. MethodsA rapid systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and the PRISMA statement. A literature search was performed in Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases on 26 August 2021. Inclusion criteria: older people, assessment of activities of daily living at baseline and discharge. Exclusion criterion: diseases affecting functional decline. ResultsEleven studies were included in the final review. Incidence of hospital-associated disability (overall score) was 37% (95% CI 0.31-0.42). Insufficient data prevented meta-analysis of the individual items. The most sensitive measure for detecting changes in disability was the overall score of assessment of activities of daily living. ConclusionsIncidence of hospital-associated disability in older patients might be overestimated, due to the combination of disease-related disability and hospital-associated disability. The tools used to assess these patients presented some limitations. These results should be interpreted with caution, as a limited number of studies reported adequate information to assess the incidence of hospital-associated disability. Risk of bias in the included studies raised some concerns.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognition, physical function, and life purpose in the rural elderly population: a systematic review protocol 96%
- Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive function in Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 95%
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 94%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 96%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Comparison of Care Utilization and Medical Institutional Death among Older Adults by Home Care Facility Type: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Fukuoka, Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 95%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 94%
- Ageing and Dementia: Age-Period-Cohort Effects of Policy Intervention in England, 2006-2016 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frailty and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19: retrospective observational study 95%
- Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review 94%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.