Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms grown on denture acrylic to denture-cleaning agents and sonication
Behbehani, M.; McDonald, A.; Nair, S. P.; Green, I. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDentures can act as reservoirs for microorganisms that cause local and systemic diseases, including opportunistic pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp, leading causes of hospital-acquired pneumonia. ObjectivesTo determine the efficacy of a brief cleaning protocol with four commonly used denture cleaning agents combined with ultra-sonic cleaning on P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii biofilms grown on denture acrylic. The effectiveness of a commercial sonicator on bacterial biofilm reduction was also evaluated. Materials and MethodsP. aeruginosa and A. baumannii 48 h biofilms were grown in artificial saliva on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) discs, exposed to four disinfectants, with or without ultra-sonication, for 1 min and the number of viable bacteria post-exposure to the treatment determined. P. aeruginosa biofilms were exposed for one or five mins to two disinfectants plus a commercial sonicator. ResultsUltra-sonication alone reduced total viable biofilm from 67.3% (A. baumannii) to 94.8% (P. aeruginosa). Without ultra-sonication, 0.012% sodium hypochlorite, Steradent(R) Active Plus and Ecolab(R) 0.2% chlorhexidine reduced P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii biofilms viable counts by between 99.3% and >99.99%. Sonication further reduced 99.3% kill to undetectable levels (>99.99% kill). Colgate(R)Total Pro-Gum Health Daily mouthwash reduced P. aeruginosa by 17% and A. baumannii biofilms by 2.1 log. These number were further reduced by >99.99% with sonication (p=<0.001). Domestic sonicators, such as those for cleaning jewellery at home, were effective when used in conjunction with denture cleaning agents. ConclusionRapid reduction of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii biofilms on denture acrylic is possible with denture-cleaning agents and sonication HighlightsO_LIFour antimicrobial agents tested against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii biofilms C_LIO_LI0.012% NaOCl and Steradent Active Plus were the most effective agents tested C_LIO_LISonication improved chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride-based agents C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Oral Microbiota Interactions with Titanium Implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of Peri-implantitis 95%
- Examination of a first-in-class bis-dialkylnorspermidine-terphenyl antibiotic in topical formulation against mono and polymicrobial biofilms 94%
- Highly Efficient Antibiofilm and Antifungal Activity of Green Propolis against Candida species in dentistry material 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploration of the antimicrobial synergy between selected natural substances on Streptococcus mutans to identify candidates for the control of dental caries 95%
- Inter-Kingdom Interactions and Environmental Influences on the Oral Microbiome in Severe Early Childhood Caries 94%
- Biofilm development of Porphyromonas gingivalis on titanium surfaces in response to 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid - a hybrid in vitro - in silico approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virucidal activity of CPC-containing oral rinses against SARS-CoV-2 variants and are active in the presence of human saliva 96%
- Use of a corneal impression membrane for the detection of Herpes Simplex Virus type-1 89%
- Evaluation of sample collection and transport strategies to enhance yield, accessibility, and biosafety of COVID-19 RT-PCR testing 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Optimised GAS-pharyngeal cell biofilm model 94%
- Association of Streptococcus mutans harboring bona-fide collagen binding proteins and Candida albicans with early childhood caries recurrence 94%
- Detailed Analysis of Surface Infection Barrier on Hands: Relationship with Morbidity to Infection Diseases and Identification of Antimicrobial Components 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.