Back

Comprehensive characterization of multi-omic landscapes between gut-microbiota metabolites and the G-protein-coupled receptors in Alzheimer's disease

Qiu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Bykova, M.; Leverenz, J. B.; Pieper, A. P.; Nussinov, R.; Caldwell, J. Z. K.; Brown, M.; Cheng, F.

2022-09-22 systems biology
10.1101/2022.09.20.508759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that gut-microbiota metabolites contribute to human disease pathophysiology, yet the host receptors that sense these metabolites are largely unknown. Here, we developed a systems pharmacogenomics framework that integrates machine learning (ML), AlphaFold2-derived structural pharmacology, and multi-omics to identify disease-relevant metabolites derived from gut-microbiota with non-olfactory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRome). Specifically, we evaluated 1.68 million metabolite-protein pairs connecting 408 human GPCRs and 516 gut metabolites using an Extra Trees algorithm-improved structural pharmacology strategy. Using genetics-derived Mendelian randomization and multi-omics (including transcriptomic and proteomic) analyses, we identified likely causal GPCR targets (C3AR, FPR1, GALR1 and TAS2R60) in Alzheimers disease (AD). Using three-dimensional structural fingerprint analysis of the metabolite-GPCR complexome, we identified over 60% of the allosteric pockets of orphan GPCR models for gut metabolites in the GPCRome, including AD-related orphan GPCRs (GPR27, GPR34, and GPR84). We additionally identified the potential targets (e.g., C3AR) of two AD-related metabolites (3-hydroxybutyric acid and Indole-3-pyruvic acid) and four metabolites from AD-related bacterium Eubacterium rectale, and also showed that tridecylic acid is a candidate ligand for orphan GPR84 in AD. In summary, this study presents a systems pharmacogenomics approach that serves to uncover the GPCR molecular targets of gut microbiota in AD and likely many other human diseases if broadly applied.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.