Odorant Mixture Separation in Drosophila Early Olfactory System
Lazar, A. A.; Liu, T.; Yeh, C.-H.; Zhou, Y.
Show abstract
Natural odorant scenes are complex landscapes comprising mixtures of volatile compounds. It was previously proposed that the Antennal Lobe circuit recovers the odorant identity in a concentration-invariant manner via divisive normalization of Local Neurons. It remains unclear, however, how identities of odorant components in a mixture is represented or recovered in the fruit fly early olfactory pathway. In the current work, we take a different approach from the traditional steady-state analyses that classify odorant mixture encoding into configural vs. elemental schemes. Instead, we focus on the spatio-temporal responses of the early olfactory pathway at the levels of the Antennal Lobe and the Mushroom Body, and formulate the odorant demixing problem as a blind source separation problem - where the identities of each individual odorant component and their corresponding concentration waveforms are recovered from the spatio-temporal PSTH of Olfactory Sensory Neurons (OSNs), Projection Neurons (PNs), and Kenyon Cells (KCs) respectively. Building upon previous models of the Antenna and the Antennal Lobe, we advanced a feedback divisive normalization architecture of the Mushroom Body Calyx circuit comprised of PN, KC and the giant Anterior Paired Lateral (APL) neuron. We demonstrate that the PN-KC-APL circuit produces a high dimensional representation of odorant mixture with robust sparsity, and results in greater odorant demixing performance than the PN responses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- State-space optimal feedback control of optogenetically driven neural activity 95%
- Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity 94%
- How to entrain a selected neuronal rhythm but not others: open-loop dithered brain stimulation for selective entrainment 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.