Back

Dimethyl fumarate modulates the Duchenne muscular dystrophy disease program following short-term treatment in mdx mice

Timpani, C. A.; Kourakis, S.; Debruin, D. A.; Campelj, D. G.; Pompeani, N.; Dargahi, N.; Bautista, A. P.; Bagaric, R. M.; Ritenis, E. J.; Sahakian, L.; Hafner, P.; Arthur, P. G.; Terrill, J. R.; Apostolopoulos, V.; de Haan, J. B.; Guven, N.; Fischer, D.; Rybalka, E.

2022-09-17 pathology
10.1101/2022.09.15.508124 bioRxiv
Show abstract

New medicines are urgently required to treat the fatal neuromuscular disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). DMD involves progressive muscle damage and weakness, which are preceded by oxidative stress, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a potent small molecule nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activator with current clinical utility in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis. Pharmaceutical targeting of Nrf2 by DMF has strong translational potential for DMD, given it: (1) promotes antioxidant defence systems; (2) has a potent immuno-modulatory profile; and (3) can be rapidly re-purposed into clinical care strategies for DMD patients. Here, we tested two weeks of daily 100mg/kg DMF versus 5mg/kg standard care prednisone (PRED) treatment during the peak muscle degeneration period in juvenile mdx mice, the gold standard murine DMD model. Both drugs modulated seed genes driving the DMD disease program and improved muscle force production in fast-twitch muscle. However, only DMF showed pro-mitochondrial effects that protected contracting muscles from fatigue, improved histopathology and augmented clinically compatible muscle function tests. In contrast, PRED treatment stunted mouse growth, worsened histopathology and modulated many normally expressed inflammatory and extracellular matrix (ECM) genes consistent with pan immunosuppression. These findings suggest DMF could be a more selective modulator of the DMD disease program with better efficacy and fewer side effects than standard care PRED therapy warranting follow-up studies to progress clinical translation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.