Back

Hippocampal damage causes retrograde amnesia for objects' visual, but not odour, properties

Lacoursiere, S. G.; McAllister, B. B.; Hadikin, C.; Tschetter, W. W.; Lehmann, H.; Sutherland, R. J.

2022-09-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.14.508050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Damage to the hippocampus produces profound retrograde amnesia, but odour and object discrimination memories can be spared in the retrograde direction. Prior lesion studies testing retrograde amnesia for object/odour discriminations are problematic due to sparing of large parts of the hippocampus, which may support memory recall, and/or the presence of uncontrolled, distinctive odours that may support object discrimination. To address these issues, we used a simple object discrimination test to assess memory in male rats. Two visually distinct objects, paired with distinct odour cues, were presented. One object was associated with a reward. Following training, neurotoxic hippocampal lesions were made using N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA). The rats were then tested on the preoperatively learned object discrimination problem, with and without the availability of odour or visual cues during testing. The rats were also postoperatively trained on a new object discrimination problem. Lesion sizes ranged from 67-97% of the hippocampus (average of 87%). On the preoperatively learned discrimination problem, the rats with hippocampal lesions showed preserved object discrimination memory when tested in the dark (i.e., without visual cues) but not when the explicit odour cues were removed from the objects. Hippocampal lesions increased the number of trials required to reach criterion but did not prevent rats from solving the postoperatively learned discrimination problem. Our results support the idea that long-term memories for odours, unlike recall of visual properties of objects, does not depend on the hippocampus in rats, consistent with previous observations that hippocampal damage does not cause retrograde amnesia for odour memories.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.0%
2
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.1%
5
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
8
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
25
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%