Mind The Gap: Data availability, accessibility, transparency, and credibility during the COVID-19 pandemic, an international comparative appraisal
Rotulo, A.; Kondilis, E.; Thwe, T.; Gautam, S.; Torcu, O.; Vera-Montoya, M.; Marjan, S.; Gazi, M. I.; Putri, A. S.; Hasan, R. B.; Mone, F. H.; Rodriguez-Castillo, K.; Tabassum, A.; Parcharidi, Z.; Sharma, B.; Islam, F.; Amoo, B.; Lemke, L.; Gallo, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundData transparency has played a key role in this pandemic. The aim of this paper is to map COVID-19 data availability and accessibility, and to rate their transparency and credibility in selected countries, by the source of information. This is used to identify knowledge gaps, and to analyse policy implications. MethodsThe availability of a number of COVID-19 metrics (incidence, mortality, number of people tested, test positive rate, number of patients hospitalised, number of patients discharged, the proportion of population who received at least one vaccine, the proportion of population fully vaccinated) was ascertained from selected countries for the full population, and for few of stratification variables (age, sex, ethnicity, socio-economic status) and subgroups (residents in nursing homes, inmates, students, healthcare and social workers, and residents in refugee camps). ResultsNine countries were included: Bangladesh, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Turkey, Panama, Greece, the UK, and the Netherlands. All countries reported periodically most of COVID-19 metrics on the total population. Data were more frequently broken down by age, sex, and region than by ethnic group or socio-economic status. Data on COVID-19 is partially available for special groups. ConclusionsThis exercise highlighted the importance of a transparent and detailed reporting of COVID-19 related variables. The more data is publicly available the more transparency, accountability, and democratisation of the research process is enabled, allowing a sound evidence-based analysis of the consequences of health policies. FundingThis study was conducted as part of the Summer School "Sustainable Health: designing a new, better normal after COVID-19". It is a researchers/student collaboration.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 96%
- Cohort Study Protocol of the Brazilian Collaborative Research Network on COVID-19: strengthening WHO global data 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of BAME community leaders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures in Southern and Central regions of Mozambique: a quantitative in-person household survey in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane 94%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 94%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 94%
- Legal residency status and its relationship with health indicators among Syrian refugees in Lebanon: a nested cross-sectional study 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring progress on health and well-being in the Eastern Mediterranean Region via voluntary national reviews, 2016 - 2021: what does the data reveal? 95%
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 94%
- Is addressing violence against women prioritised in health policies? Findings from a WHO Policies Database 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking changes in reporting of epidemiological data during the COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia: an observational study during the first wave 94%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 93%
- When mistrust in the government and scientists reinforce social inequalities in vaccination against Covid-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.