The SweDen risk score- predicting death 1-year after myocardial infarction
Rylance, R. T.; Wagner, P.; Olesen, K. K. W.; Carlson, J.; Alfredsson, J.; Jernberg, T.; Leosdottir, M.; Johansson, P.; Vasko, P.; Maeng, M.; Mohammed, M.; Erlinge, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesOur aim was to derive, based on the SWEDEHEART registry, and validate, using the Western Denmark Heart registry, a patient-oriented risk score, the SweDen score, which could calculate the risk of 1-year mortality following a myocardial infarction (MI). MethodsThe factors included in the SweDen score were age, sex, smoking, diabetes, heart failure, and statin use. These were chosen a priori by the SWEDEHEART steering group based on the premise that the factors were information known by the patients themselves. The score was evaluated using various statistical methods such as time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curves of the linear predictor, area under the curve metrics, Kaplan-Meier survivor curves, and the calibration slope. ResultsThe area under the curve values were 0.81 in the derivation data and 0.76 in the validation data. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar patient profiles across datasets. The calibration slope was 1.03 (95% CI 0.99-1.08) in the validation data using the linear predictor from the derivation data. ConclusionsThe SweDen risk score is a novel tool created for patient use. The risk score calculator will be available online and presents mortality risk on a colour scale to simplify interpretation and to avoid exact life span expectancies. It provides a validated patient-oriented risk score predicting the risk of death at 1 year after suffering a MI, which visualizes the benefit of statin use and smoking cessation in a simple way.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 94%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 93%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic significance of BMI after PCI treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction A cohort study from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry 95%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 93%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 94%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 94%
- Cohort profile: The LipidCardio Study - Role of Lipoproteins in Cardiovascular Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 93%
- Effects of Singing on Vascular Health in Older Adults with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial 93%
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 94%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 94%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.