Back

Mathematical reconstruction of the metabolic network in an in-vitro multiple myeloma model.

Vera-Siguenza, E.; Escribano-Gonzalez, C.; Serrano-Gonzalo, I.; Eskla, K.-L.; Spill, F.; Tennant, D. A.

2022-09-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.09.12.507672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

It is increasingly apparent that cancer cells, in addition to remodelling their metabolism to survive and proliferate, adapt and manipulate the metabolism of other cells. This property may be a telling sign that pre-clinical tumour metabolism studies that exclusively utilise in-vitro mono-culture models could prove to be limited for uncovering novel metabolic targets that can translate into clinical therapies. Although this is increasingly recognised, and work addressing this is becoming routinary in a rapidly emerging field, much remains unknown. This study employs an interdisciplinary approach that leverages the predictive power of mathematical modelling to enrich experimental findings. We develop a functional multicellular in-silico model that facilitates the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the metabolic network spawned by an in-vitro co-culture model of bone marrow mesenchymal stem- and myeloma cell lines. To procure this model, we devised a bespoke human genome constraint-based reconstruction workflow that combines aspects from the legacy mCADRE & Metabotools algorithms, the novel redHuman algorithm, along with 13C-metabolic flux analysis. Our workflow transforms the latest human metabolic network matrix (Recon3D) into two cell-specific models coupled with a metabolic network spanning a shared growth medium. When cross-validating our in-silico model against the in-vitro model, we found that the in-silico model successfully reproduces vital metabolic behaviours of its in-vitro counterpart; results include cell growth predictions, respiration rates, as well as support for observations which suggest cross-shuttling of redox-active metabolites between cells. Together, our methodology and its results provide yet another step toward the relevance of studies of this type in the field.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.