Anchors for Time, Distance, and Magnitude in Virtual Movements
Gladhill, K. A.; Robinson, E. M.; Stanfield-Wiswell, C.; Bader, F.; Wiener, M.
Show abstract
In order to navigate through the environment, humans must be able to measure both the distance traveled in space, and the interval covered in time. Yet, how these two dimensions are computed and interact across neural systems remains unknown. One possibility is that subjects measure how far and how long they have traveled relative to a known reference point, or anchor. To measure this, we had human participants (n=24) perform a distance estimation task in a virtual environment in which they were cued to attend to either the spatial or temporal interval traveled, while responses were measured with multiband fMRI. We observed that both dimensions evoked similar frontoparietal networks, yet with a striking rostrocaudal dissociation between temporal and spatial estimation. Multivariate classifiers trained on each dimension were further able to predict the temporal or spatial interval traveled, with centers of activation within the supplementary motor area (SMA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) for time and space, respectively. Further, a cross-classification approach revealed the right supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and occipital place area (OPA) as regions capable of decoding the general magnitude of the traveled distance. Altogether, our findings suggest the brain uses separate systems for tracking spatial and temporal distances, which are combined together along with amodal estimates.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Local and distributed cortical markers of effort expenditure during sustained goal pursuit 95%
- A human cortical adaptive mutual inhibition circuit underlying competition for perceptual decision and repetition suppression reversal 94%
- The strength of feedback processing is associated with resistance to visual backward masking during illusory contour processing in adult humans. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.