Back

Optimization and redevelopment of single-cell data analysis workflow based on deep generative models

Liu, Y.; Fu, Q.; Dong, C.; Xia, X.; Liu, G.; Liu, L.

2022-09-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.09.12.507562 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present single-cell RNA sequencing(scRNA-seq) analysis pipelines require a combination of appropriate normalization, dimension reduction, clustering, and specific-gene analysis algorithms, but the rationale for the choice of these algorithms is relatively subjective because of the lack of ground truth assessment conclusions. As the number of captured single-cells increases, the number of different types of noise cells also increases, which can strongly affect the analysis efficiency. For scRNA-seq, a technology that generates data through multi-process operations, the deep generative model should be a good choice for this type of data analysis, allowing simultaneous estimation of multiple unobservable parameters assumed in the data generation process. Hence, in our study, we sequenced a pool of pre-labeled single cells to obtain a batch of scRNA-seq data with main and fine labels, which was then used to evaluate the clustering and specific-gene analysis methods. Afterward, we applied two deep generative models to infer the probabilities of pseudo and impurity cells. And by stepwise removing the inferred noise cells, the clustering performance and the consistency of different specific-gene analysis methods are both greatly improved. After that, we applied Deep-LDA (a latent Dirichlet allocation-based deep generative model) to scRNA-seq data analysis. And this model takes the count matrix as input, and makes the classification and specific gene optimization process mutually dependent, which has more practical sense and simplifies the analysis workflow. At last, we successfully implemented the model with transferred knowledge to make single-cell annotation and verified its superior performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.