Back

Quantification of membrane binding and diffusion using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy diffusion laws

Mouttou, A.; Bremaud, E.; Noero, J.; Dibsy, R.; Arone, C.; Mak, J.; MURIAUX, D.; Berry, H.; Favard, C.

2022-09-14 biophysics
10.1101/2022.09.12.507540 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many transient processes in cells arise from the binding of cytosolic proteins to membranes. Quantifying this membrane binding and its associated diffusion in the living cell is therefore of primary importance. Dynamic photonic microscopies, e.g. single/multiple particle tracking, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) enable noninvasive measurement of molecular mobility in living cells and their plasma membranes. However, FCS with a single beam waist is of limited applicability with complex, non Brownian, motions. Recently, the development of FCS diffusion laws methods has given access to the characterization of these complex motions, although none of them is applicable to the membrane binding case at the moment. In this study, we combined computer simulations and FCS experiments to propose an FCS diffusion law for membrane binding. First, we generated computer simulations of spot-variation FCS (svFCS) measurements for a membrane binding process combined to 2D and 3D diffusion at the membrane and in the bulk/cytosol, respectively. Then, using these simulations as a learning set, we derived an empirical diffusion law with three free parameters: the apparent binding constant KDapp, the diffusion coefficient on the membrane D2D and the diffusion coefficient in the bulk/cytosol, D3D. Finally, we monitored, using svFCS, the dynamics of retroviral Gag proteins and associated mutants during their binding to supported lipid bilayers of different lipid composition or at plasma membranes of living cells and we quantified KDapp and D2D in these conditions using our empirical diffusion law. Based on these experiments and numerical simulations, we conclude that this new approach enables correct estimation of membrane partitioning and membrane diffusion properties (KDapp and D2D) for peripheral membrane molecules.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
3
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
5
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
8
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
14
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%