Back

Two gustatory receptors involved in host plant recognition of silkworm larvae

Endo, H.; Tsuneto, K.; Yamagishi, T.; Dingze, M.; Ito, K.; Nagata, S.; Sato, R.

2022-09-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.12.507514 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herbivorous insects can identify their host plants by sensing plant secondary metabolites as chemical cues. We previously reported the two-factor host acceptance system of the silkworm Bombyx mori larvae. The chemosensory neurons in the maxillary palp (MP) of the larvae detect mulberry secondary metabolites, chlorogenic acid (CGA), and isoquercitrin (ISQ), with ultrahigh sensitivity, for host plant recognition and feeding initiation. Nevertheless, the molecular basis for the ultrasensitive sensing of these compounds remains unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that two gustatory receptors (Grs), BmGr6 and BmGr9, are responsible for sensing the mulberry compounds with attomolar sensitivity for host plant recognition by silkworm larvae. Calcium imaging assay using cultured cells expressing the silkworm putative sugar receptors (BmGr4-10) revealed that BmGr6 and BmGr9 serve as receptors for CGA and ISQ with attomolar sensitivity in human embryonic kidney 293T cells. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout (KO) of BmGr6 and BmGr9 resulted in a low probability of making a test bite of the mulberry leaves, suggesting that they lost the ability to recognize host leaves specifically. Electrophysiological recordings showed that the loss of host recognition ability in the Gr-KO strains was due to a drastic decrease in MP sensitivity toward ISQ in BmGr6-KO larvae and toward CGA and ISQ in BmGr9-KO larvae. Our findings unraveled that the two Grs, which have been regarded as sugar receptors, are molecules responsible for detecting plant phenolics in host plant recognition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
3
Neuroscience Bulletin
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
8
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
20
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
30
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%