Back

A critical period for neurogenesis loss and cognitive decline in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients

Ammothumkandy, A.; Corona, L.; Ravina, K.; Wolseley, V.; Jimenez, N.; Armacost, M.; D'Orazio, L. M.; Nelson, J.; Zuverza-Chavarria, V.; McCleary, C.; Nune, G.; Kalayjian, L.; Lee, D.; Lee, B.; Heck, C.; Chow, R. H.; Russin, J. J.; Liu, C. Y.; Smith, J. A.; Bonaguidi, M. A.

2022-09-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.12.507339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is a syndromic disorder presenting with seizures and cognitive comorbidities. While seizure etiology is increasingly understood, the pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cognitive decline and epilepsy progression remain less recognized. We have previously shown that adult hippocampal neurogenesis, a process contributing to visual spatial learning and memory in rodents, dramatically declines in MTLE patients with increased disease duration. Here, we investigate when multiple cognitive domains become effected by epilepsy disease duration and how human neurogenesis levels contribute to it. We find that intelligence, and verbal learning and memory decline at a critical period of 20 years disease duration. Surprisingly, the number of human immature neurons positively associate with auditory verbal, rather than visuospatial, learning and memory. Moreover, we uncover cognitive functions enriched to either immature or mature granule neurons and functions shared between them. Our study provides cellular evidence of how adult neurogenesis contributes to human cognition, and signifies an opportunity to advance regenerative medicine for patients with MTLE and other cognitive disorders. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=108 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/507339v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12d6c9forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13670aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11efda3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19de537_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.