Evaluation of long-term sequelae by cardiopulmonary exercise testing 12 months after hospitalization for critical COVID-19
Noureddine, S.; Roux, P.; Laurent, L.; Ritter, O.; Dolla, P.; Karaer, S.; Claude, F.; Westeel, V.; Barnig, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an important clinical tool that provides a global assessment of the respiratory, circulatory and metabolic responses to exercise which are not adequately reflected through the measurement of individual organ system function at rest. In the context of critical COVID-19, CPET is an ideal approach for assessing long term sequalae. MethodsIn this prospective single-center study, we performed CPET in 60 patients, 12 months after a critical COVID-19 infection that required intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Lung function at rest and chest computed tomography (CT) scan were also performed. ResultsTwelve months after severe COVID-19 pneumonia, the majority of the patients had a peak O2 uptake (VO2) considered within normal limits. However, length of ICU stay remained an independent predictor of VO2. Surprisingly, more than half of the patients with a normal peak predicted VO2 showed ventilatory inefficiency during exercise (high VE/VCO2 ratio and high VE/VCO2 slope) with increased physiological dead space (VD/Vt) and low end-tidal CO2 partial pressure (PETCO2) values. This impairment was even more pronounced in patients with persistent dyspnea. Notably, peak VD/Vt values were positively correlated with peak D-Dimer plasma concentrations from blood samples collected during ICU stay. ConclusionsEven if reduced exercise capacity was rare 12 months after critical COVID-19, more than half of the patients with normal exercise capacity showed ventilatory inefficiency.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 94%
- Early prone positioning does not improve the outcome of patients with mild pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2: results from an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the EPCoT Study) 93%
- COPD in the time of COVID-19: An analysis of acute exacerbations and reported behavioural changes in patients with COPD 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 96%
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 95%
- Safety and efficacy of Pulmonary physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (PPTCOVID Study): A prospective, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of popular pulse oximeters compared with simultaneous arterial oxygen saturation or clinical-grade pulse oximetry: a cross-sectional validation study in intensive care patients 92%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 92%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perfusion imaging heterogeneity during NO inhalation distinguishes pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) from healthy subjects and has potential as an imaging biomarker 93%
- Vascular Inflammation in Lungs of Patients with Fatal Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Possible role for the NLRP3 inflammasome 92%
- Nephrectomy and high-salt diet inducing pulmonary hypertension and kidney damage by increasing Ang II concentration in rats 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 93%
- Administration of tocilizumab to patients with high concentrations of IL-6 in the course of COVID-19 is associated with a better prognosis 93%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.