Back

High serum uric acid levels are associated with worse cognitive performance: A cross-sectional study.

Khaled, Y.; Abdelhamid, A. A.; Al-Mazroey, H.; Almannai, A. K.; Fetais, S.; Al-Srami, A. S.; Ahmed, S.; Al-Hajri, N.; Chivese, T.; Djouhri, L.

2022-09-12 neurology
10.1101/2022.09.11.22279827 medRxiv
Show abstract

(1) BackgroundThe association between raised serum uric acid and cognitive dysfunction remains a debated issue. In the present study, we investigated whether serum uric acid is associated with cognitive performance in a cohort of healthy individuals in Qatar; (2) MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study on a cohort of individuals aged 40 to 80 years old, without a diagnosis of dementia, schizophrenia, and stroke, who participated in Qatar Biobank. Cognitive performance was assessed using the CANTABs paired episodic memory test and reaction time test. The participants were divided into two groups, one group with a normal serum uric acid level (<350 mol/l) and the other with high serum uric acid levels (>350 mol/l). Two multivariable linear regression models were applied to determine the association between serum uric acid and memory test performance score and between serum uric acid and reaction time test performance score; (3) ResultsA total of 996 individuals with median age 48.0 years, IQR: (44.5, 54.0), of which 48.2% were male, were included. After adjusted multivariable linear regression, high serum uric acid levels were strongly associated with poor performance in the paired episodic memory test (beta -6.25, 95%CI - 10.65 to -1.84, p= 0.006). However, after adjusted multivariable linear regression, we found no significant association between high serum uric acid and performance in the reaction time test (beta - 13.24, 95%CI -138.77 to 112.29, p= 0.836,); (4) ConclusionsIn a cohort of healthy individuals in Qatar, high serum uric acid levels are associated with worse performance in visual memory and new learning domains of cognitive function but no significant effect on processing speed function.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.