Back

Mucosal vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 elicits superior systemic T central memory function and cross-neutralizing antibodies against variants of concern

ONeill, A.; Kala, M. P.; Tan, C. W.; Saron, W. A. A.; Mantri, C. K.; Rathore, A. P. S.; Wang, L.-F.; St. John, A. L.

2022-09-09 immunology
10.1101/2022.09.09.507250 bioRxiv
Show abstract

COVID-19 vaccines used in humans are highly effective in limiting disease and death caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, yet improved vaccines that provide greater protection at mucosal surfaces, which could reduce break-through infections and subsequent transmission, are still needed. Here we show that intranasal (I.N.) vaccination with the receptor binding domain of Spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (S-RBD) in combination with the mucosal adjuvant mastoparan-7 improved systemic T cell responses compared to an equivalent dose of antigen delivered by the sub-cutaneous (S.C.) route, adjuvanted by either M7 or the gold-standard adjuvant, alum. T cell phenotypes induced by I.N. vaccine administration included enhanced polyfunctionality (combined IFN-{gamma} and TNF expression) and greater numbers of T central memory (TCM) cells. These phenotypes were T cell-intrinsic and could be recalled in the lungs and/or brachial LNs upon antigen challenge after adoptive T cell transfer to naive recipients. Furthermore, mucosal vaccination induced antibody responses that were similarly effective in neutralizing the binding of the parental strain of S-RBD to its ACE2 receptor, but showed greater cross-neutralizing capacity against multiple variants of concern (VOC), compared to S.C. vaccination. These results highlight the role of nasal vaccine administration in imprinting an immune profile associated with long-term T cell retention and diversified neutralizing antibody responses, which could be applied to improve vaccines for COVID-19 and other infectious diseases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.