Back

The evolution of host resistance to a virus is determined by resources, historical contingency, and time scale

Visher, E.; Mahjoub, H.; Soufi, K.; Pascual, N.; Hoang, V.; Bartlett, L. J.; Roberts, K. E.; Meaden, S.; Boots, M.

2022-09-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.09.08.507185 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hosts can often evolve resistance to parasites (and other stressors), but such resistance is generally thought to be constrained by trade-offs with other traits. These trade-offs determine the hosts optimal resistance strategy and whether resistance cycles, diversifies, and/or is maintained in the absence of parasite. However, trade-offs are often inconsistently measured across experiments and can depend on environmental conditions. Here, we extend a selection experiment evolving resistance to viral infection under variable resource quality in the Plodia interpunctella model system to explore the evolutionary conditions leading to an incongruent earlier measurement of costless resistance. We find that environmental resource quality, historical contingency, and the time scale of selection all affect trade-offs in our long-term selection experiment. Specifically, populations selected for resistance with the dual stressor of low resource quality are slowed, but not prevented, from evolving resistance. Second, variation in starting populations or early sampled adaptations led to contingency towards context-dependent resistance. Finally, some costs to resistance observed at early time points were compensated over longer evolutionary time scales. Our work therefore informs perspectives for the predictability of adaptation and how variation in specific evolutionary conditions can alter the evolutionary trajectories of a population towards costly or costless resistance strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.4%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
22
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
24
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
27
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%