Back

HRDex: a tool for deriving homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores from whole exome sequencing data

Pluta, J.; Hausler, R.; Wubbenhorst, B.; Desai, H.; Domchek, S. M.; Nathanson, K. L.; Maxwell, K. N.

2022-09-12 genomics
10.1101/2022.09.08.506670 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBreast and ovarian tumors in patients with biallelic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations either by germline mutations accompanied by allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or truncal somatic mutations respond to PARP inhibition. The repair of double stranded DNA breaks in tumors these tumors leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which can be measured using a variety of genomic and transcriptomic signatures. However, the optimal biomarker for BRCA deficiency is unknown. MethodsWe developed HRDex to determine HRD and its composite scores from allele specific copy number data analysis of whole exome sequencing (WES) data and examined the discriminatory ability of HRDex and other genomic and transcriptomic measures to identify BRCA deficiency in breast and ovarian tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). ResultsHRDex scores have high correlation with SNP array based HRD scores in both breast and ovarian cancers. HRDex scores have high discriminatory accuracy to distinguish BRCA deficient breast tumors, similar to SNP array based scores (AUC 0.87 vs 0.90); however, discriminatory ability for ovarian tumors was lower (AUC 0.79 vs 0.90). HRD-LST had the best discriminatory ability of the three composite HRD scores. HRDex had higher discriminatory ability for identification of BRCA deficiency than RNA expression based scores (eCARD, tp53, RPS and PARPi7) in breast and ovarian tumors. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was associated with BRCA deficiency in breast but not ovarian cancer. Combining HRDex score with mutational signature 3 modestly increased discriminatory ability for BRCA deficient breast and ovarian tumors (breast: AUC 0.90 vs 0.87; ovarian: AUC 0.83 vs 0.79). ConclusionsWES based HRD scores perform similarly to SNP array HRD scores, and better than other genomic or transcriptomic signatures, for identification of tumors with BRCA deficiency due to biallelic BRCA loss.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.9%
5
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
21
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%