Evolution of schooling propensity in the guppy drives changes in anti-predator behavior that are linked to neuroanatomy
Corral-Lopez, A.; Kotrschal, A.; Szorkovszky, A.; Garate-Olaizola, M.; Herbert-Read, J.; van der Bijl, W.; Romenskyy, M.; Zeng, H.-L.; Buechel, S. D.; Fontrodona-Eslava, A.; Pelckmans, K.; Mank, J. E.; Kolm, N.
Show abstract
One of the most spectacular displays of social behavior is the synchronized movements that many animal groups perform to travel, forage and escape from predators. However, elucidating the neural mechanisms underlying the evolution of collective behaviors, as well as their fitness effects, remains challenging. Here, we study anti-predator behavior in guppies experimentally selected for divergence in polarization, an important behavioral aspect of coordinated movement. We find that groups from artificially selected lines remain more polarized than control groups in the presence of a threat. Neuroanatomical measurements of polarization-selected individuals indicated changes in brain regions previously suggested to be important regulators of perception, fear and attention, and motor response. Additional visual acuity and temporal resolution tests performed in polarization-selected and control individuals indicate that observed differences in anti-predator and schooling behavior should not be attributable to changes in visual perception, but rather are more likely the result of the more efficient relay of sensory input in the brain of polarization-selected fish. Our findings highlight that brain morphology may play a fundamental role in the evolution of coordinated movement and anti-predator behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation of the endothelin receptor B makes blue fish yellow 95%
- Biomechanics and neural circuits for vestibular-induced fine postural control in larval zebrafish 95%
- A chromosome level genome of Astyanax mexicanus surface fish for comparing population-specific genetic differences contributing to trait evolution. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.